Poland as the ‘Slavic Turkey’ of NATO Destabilization

Poland, the eager American servant that it has been, has now officially taken on the role of the ‘Slavic Turkey’ in relation to Ukraine. Just as Turkey has been a geopolitically convenient conduit for arms, personnel, and material support for the Syrian terrorists, so too has Poland begun to officially fulfill this role for their Ukrainian counterparts.

Prime Minister Tusk stated on 20 February, 2014 that Poland is already treating the injured insurgents from Kiev, and has actually ordered the military and interior ministry to provide hospitals to help even more. The deputy health minister has confirmed that Warsaw is in contact with the rebels in Kiev “in making plans to take in Ukrainian wounded”.This means that Poland has formally extended its covert and diplomatic reach nearly 300 miles into the interior of Ukraine, and that its intelligence services are obviously doing more in Ukraine than just ‘helping the wounded’ (terrorists). It is even more likely that Polish influence is even stronger in Lviv and Volyn Oblasts, the regions bordering Poland, and coincidentally or not, Lviv has already attempted to declare independence. The same can be said of Turkish influence deep into Syria at the height of the crisis in that country, and one must be reminded of the fact that Turkey also helped the wounded fighters in that country recover on its territory.

The structural similarities between Poland and Turkey in relation to Ukraine and Syria need to be examined in order to more clearly understand how the ‘Lead from Behind’ template has been applied to both case studies.

Burning Central Kiev in the new stage of "Eurointergation", February 2014.
Burning Central Kiev represents a new stage of “Eurointergation”. Photo taken on the Independence square in February 2014.

First of all, the ‘Lead from Behind’ strategy has been defined as “discreet U.S. military assistance with [others] doing the trumpeting”. It is the new strategy of warfare for theaters where the US, for whatever reasons, is reluctant to directly militarily engage itself. It relies on using regional allies/’leaders’ as proxies to further US geostrategic and geopolitical goals via asymmetrical measures while Washington pivots to Asia, where it aims to present a conventional deterrent to China. Both Poland and Turkey are the US’ puppets of choice in their respective theaters against their neighboring targeted states (Ukraine and Syria). At the least, the US provides intelligence support and the training of ‘opposition’ units, while Poland and Turkey pull the weight in directly assisting those members during their deployments in the victimized nations. In the case of Ukraine, the US utilized NGOs to infiltrate the country over a more than 10-year period and also allocated $5 billion to “help Ukraine achieve [the development of democratic institutions]”. The National Endowment for Democracy has also been pivotal in peddling the ‘Kony 2012 of Ukraine’ in order to advance their psy-op campaign against Kiev, just as ‘Syrian Danny’ was the version deployed against Damascus.

But the similarities do not end there.

Both Poland and Turkey are frontier NATO states, with Poland being described as “the largest and most important NATO frontline state in terms of military, political and economic power.” These two geostrategic states also have an overwhelming population when compared to their neighbors, as well as national inferiority complexes stemming from their lost imperial legacies (the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Ottoman Empire). They share a significant land border with the states targeted for a ‘democratic transition’, as well as important cultural and political connections with those societies (as a result of the aforementioned imperial legacies) prior to the unleashing of the respective crises. This gives them significant intangible benefits over the future battlefield, both in state, non-state, and informational activities.

ukraine syria libyaPoland and Turkey also host important American military installations. Turkey houses the US Air Force at Incirlik and an anti-missile defense radar in the east, while Poland provides the US with the Lask Air Force Base and an anti-missile defense outpost in the northeast near Kaliningrad. In regards to the development of the insurgents’ mission, the Ukrainian Fascists are taking on disturbingly similar characteristics to the Jihadists in Syria. In 2011, random sniper fire (attributed to the ‘rebels’) was targeting civilians in Damascus, just as the same has begun to occur in Kiev, even targeting a reporter from RT. The Lviv request for independence can be seen as following the declaration of autonomy of Syria’s Kurds, as both areas abut the border of the proxy state interfering in the affairs of its neighbor. In a similar fashion, both insurgent groups have taken over border control posts connected to their patron state, and this move obviously increases the ease with which Ankara and Warsaw can funnel arms, personnel, and materials to their subversive spawn. When the borders cannot be held by the insurgents, they resort to ransacking government depots and stealing arms from captured government forces and occupied buildings.   The Syrian fighters have a history of hostage taking and brutal executions, and their Ukrainian comrades have followed their lead by capturing over 60 police officers in Kiev.

It has thus clearly been demonstratively shown via the aforementioned examples that the destabilizations of both Ukraine and Syria are modelled off of a patterned approach. The US utilizes proxy states with injured imperial legacies in order to advance its ‘Lead from Behind’ strategy, targeting pivotal geostrategic areas where the US prefers to maintain a plausible deniability over its role and is reluctant to get too directly involved. One can also discern a larger trend developing – the use of extreme macro-regional ideological movements to support long-term destabilization. In the Middle East, extreme Islam is the method of choice for application and export, whereas in Ukraine, it is increasingly appearing as though extreme far-right (in some applications, even Neo-Nazi) group fit the ‘Wahhabi role’ for Europe. Ukraine could quite possibly become a training ground for other European far-right militants, or the ones currently in Ukraine can go on to teach the ‘tools of their trade’ to the highest bidder in other European states. Just as Turkey is supporting the extreme Islamists in Syria via its support for the fighters there, Poland can be said to be flirting with extreme far-right nationalists in Ukraine through its statements of support for the violent opposition and its recent decision to evacuate and help the wounded insurgents (not even counting the unreported level of covert involvement already ongoing). And just as the extreme Islamists got out of the control of their handlers and now endanger the entire Middle East, the risk remains that the extreme far-right nationalists may become uncontrollable in Ukraine as well and come to endanger the entire EU. When comparing Poland to Turkey and Ukraine to Syria, it is proven that the Arab Spring has come to Europe in more ways than meet the eye.

OR note:  Three years of the fierce anti-Assad campaign have brought nothing but political expenses to Turkey. Now Turkish Prime-Minister Recep Erdogan is trying to balance his poorly motivated policy towards Syria and to regain regional and public support, notably deteriorated as a result of his reckless implication in the Syrian tragedy. His latest visit to Tehran has shown the drastic shift in both Turkish rhetoric and approaches on the matter. So Turkey has likely learned the bitter lesson of playing aliens’ games in a neighboring country. Will Poland be able to soberly review its role in the horrific Ukrainian crisis too is still an open issue…

Reposts are welcomed with the reference to ORIENTAL REVIEW.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  1. Walt DuBlanica

    Putin said it best “the Poles are a disgrace to the Slavic race’.

  2. @Walt, frankly we do not remember him saying such thing. Could you please provide a link?

  3. Pingback: Polonia, la ‘Turchia slava’ della destabilizzazione NATO | Aurora

  4. Pingback: Polonia, la ‘Turchia slava’ della destabilizzazione NATO | Informare per Resistere

  5. Pingback: Polonia, la ‘Turchia slava’ della destabilizzazione NATO | Terra Santa Libera

  6. Pingback: Μετά το τουρκικό μοντέλο, το σλαβικό αντίγραφο | ΜΕΤΩΠΟ ΟΧΙ

  7. Pingback: Poland as the ‘Slavic Turkey’ of NATO Destabilization | Terra Santa Libera

  8. Pingback: Proof of Poland’s Participation in the Ukrainian Pandemonium | Oriental Review

  9. Pingback: Poland’s Participation in the Ukrainian Pandemonium | MasterAdrian's Weblog



  12. “Poland, the eager American servant…” Better to be an American servant than Russian. All you have to do is to look at Poland as it was 25 years ago and now. Some 350 years ago when Polish nobles were fighting Cossacks in Ukraine, Russia through the same means as Poles today, help them separate most of eastern portion of that country from Poland. Today, Poland is simply returning the favor. Payback is a b…… my friends, No more Ukraine for you!


  14. Pingback: Lessons and Consequences of World War I: Back to the Future? (I) | Oriental Review

  15. Pingback: Sikorski and Dziewulski: The Strategy and Tactics of the Neo-Commonwealth | Oriental Review

  16. Pingback: Poland’s Hand in Ukraine: Security Advisor to former Polish President in “Anti-terrorist Operation” in Slavyansk | The Other

  17. Pingback: The Reverse Brzezinski: The Ultimate Eurasian Dilemma (II) | Oriental Review

  18. Pingback: Poland and Ukraine: history of break-downs | Oriental Review

  19. Pingback: Poland and Ukraine: History of Break-Downs | Your Newsline Independent Reporting From Around The World

  20. Pingback: The Reverse Brzezinski: The Ultimate Eurasian Dilemma (II) | Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction

  21. Pingback: Poland and the West: Between Betrayal and One-Sided Benefits (II) | Oriental Review

  22. Pingback: The Galician Backhand (II) | Oriental Review

  23. Pingback: The Galician Backhand (II) – orientalreview 05.11.2014 | Steven25's Blog

  24. Pingback: Is Poland Rushing To Save Poroshenko With More Right-Wing Militants? | Oriental Review

  25. Pingback: Vatican clergy and Ukrainian nationalism (II)

  26. Pingback: Pope Francis Is The World’s Most Influential Agent Of Ukrainian Nationalism | The Vineyard of the Saker

  27. Pingback: Are Armenia And Belarus Wandering Westward? | The Vineyard of the Saker

  28. Pingback: Polonia, la ‘Turchia slava’ della destabilizzazione NATO | Generale Russo Venaus

  29. Pingback: Vatican Clergy And Ukrainian Nationalism

  30. Pingback: Lessons and Consequences of World War I: Back to the Future? (I) – OrientalReview.org

  31. Pingback: Is Poland Rushing To Save Poroshenko With More Right-Wing Militants? | OrientalReview.org

  32. Pingback: Bagian I: Konteks Teoretis | | Eskatologi Islam

  33. Another excellent article about Poland destabilizing the situation in Ukraine.

  34. Pingback: An Invasion of Venezuela Isn’t A “Far-Fetched Scenario” |  SHOAH

  35. Pingback: The US’ Reported Post-War Backup Plans In Ukraine Hint That Kiev’s Defeat Is Imminent – OrientalReview.org

  36. Pingback: Poland as the ‘Slavic Turkey’ of NATO — Oriental Review | Vermont Folk Troth

Leave a Reply