Sub-Saharan Africa is growing a little faster than expected, and that is notable because the global background is hostile. In its semi-annual Africa Economic Update, published on Tuesday, the World Bank projected regional growth of 4.3% in 2026, up from 4.1% last year and 0.3 percentage point above its April forecast. The upgrade comes despite the headwinds from the war involving Iran, which has pushed up fuel and fertilizer prices around the world. The headline is positive, but the detail suggests a region whose gains depend heavily on commodity prices and external financing, two things its governments do not control.
Andrew Dabalen, the Bank’s chief economist for the Africa region, described the numbers as evidence of “remarkable resilience” in a “challenging global environment.” He credited “years of reforms and improved economic management” for the gains. Forecasts were raised for nearly three-quarters of the countries in the region, among them Angola, Ethiopia, Nigeria and Zambia.
The statement is worth reading for what it claims and what it leaves open. The scale of the change is modest: a rise of two-tenths of a percentage point from the 2025 outcome, and three-tenths relative to the spring forecast. The breadth is more striking, since a majority of countries saw their outlooks improve at the same time. That suggests the upgrade is not driven by one or two large economies alone.
The most important reason for the improvement is the price of commodities. The Bank notes that higher oil prices hurt countries that rely on fuel imports, but they produce a windfall for oil exporters, including several in Africa. Higher commodity prices have also helped copper producers such as Zambia.
This creates two groups with very different experiences of the same shock. Exporters of oil and metals gain revenue, foreign exchange and fiscal space, which can support growth and public spending. Importers of fuel face higher transport and energy bills, pressure on their currencies and, for those with limited reserves, a squeeze on the budget. The regional average hides this divide. A country that benefits this year from high prices could find the effect reversed if the Iran conflict eases and prices fall, or if production problems hold back exports.
The inclusion of Angola, Nigeria and Zambia among the upgraded economies fits the pattern, since each depends heavily on oil or copper. Ethiopia’s upgrade shows that the improvement is not confined to resource exporters, although the Bank’s short statement gives no breakdown of its causes.
Against the improved growth figures, the Bank warns that risks remain tilted to the downside. The main reason is inflation. Higher fuel and fertilizer prices, caused by the Middle East conflict, are pushing up consumer prices, and the Bank expects median inflation in the region to rise to 5.5% this year from 3.7% in 2025.
Fertilizer deserves particular attention. Agriculture is the main source of livelihoods in much of the region, and most farmers are price takers with little capacity to absorb higher input costs. If fertilizer becomes too expensive, farmers may use less of it, which lowers yields and raises food prices later. Higher fuel costs add to the price of moving food to markets. Together these channels mean that a global energy shock can turn into a local cost-of-living problem even in countries that gain from commodity exports. For central banks, the challenge is that tightening policy to contain prices can slow growth, particularly in economies already facing high borrowing costs.
The Bank’s most forward-looking warning concerns money. “With development assistance declining, countries face growing pressure to mobilize domestic resource mobilization, deepen local capital markets, and secure more sustainable financing,” it said. The phrasing is awkward, but the message is clear: the era of relying on aid flows is fading, and governments must find other sources.
That points to three tasks. The first is raising more tax revenue, which means expanding the tax base and improving collection, areas where many African states collect a lower share of GDP than other regions. The second is developing local capital markets, so that governments and firms can borrow in domestic currency from domestic savers, reducing exposure to exchange-rate swings and to foreign lenders. The third is securing financing that is sustainable, in other words avoiding debt that becomes unmanageable when interest rates or commodity prices move against the borrower.
These tasks are slow and politically difficult, and they must be undertaken while commodity windfalls tempt governments to spend rather than reform. The Bank’s argument is implicitly that good times should be used for building institutions, not just for raising expenditure.
Three points help put the numbers in perspective.
First, a growth rate of 4.3% is respectable but not transformative. In a region with fast population growth, it implies only modest gains in income per person, and it is below the rates that would be needed to cut poverty rapidly.
Second, the quality of growth matters as much as its pace. Resource-driven expansion can lift output without creating many jobs, as the contrast between headline growth and employment in resource-rich economies often shows. The Bank’s emphasis on resilience says little about whether ordinary households feel better off, especially with inflation set to be higher.
Third, the forecast is conditional on external events. If the Iran-related energy shock deepens, importers will suffer more and the inflation forecast may prove too low. If it fades, oil exporters will lose some of their windfall. Either way, the region’s performance is being shaped largely by decisions made far from its capitals.
The World Bank’s upgraded forecast is a genuine piece of good news, showing that many African economies have been able to absorb a difficult year better than expected. But the figures also show how much of that strength comes from favourable prices and how little buffer remains against shocks. Rising inflation, declining aid and the uneven split between winners and losers from higher oil prices mean that the headline growth rate overstates the region’s security. The test for governments over the coming year is whether they use the current advantage to build domestic revenues, deeper financial markets and more diversified economies, so that the next upgrade rests on stronger foundations than commodity prices alone.
Comments