Since its foundation in 2001, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has evolved into a major multilateral platform bringing together China, Russia, and several Central and South Asian countries. It is commonly framed as a cooperative forum focused on regional security, counterterrorism, and economic development. However, beneath its surface of unity, it also reflects a subtle strategic contest—especially between Russia and China. While the two powers often present a united front against Western influence, Russia’s internal strategy within the SCO reveals a careful calibration aimed at balancing China’s growing power and preserving Moscow’s regional leadership, especially in Central Asia. In other words, Russia’s strategy toward China within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is shaped by a delicate balance of cooperation and competition.
Here’s a breakdown of Russia’s key strategic objectives and tactics within the SCO:
- Maintaining Strategic Balance with China: Russia recognizes China’s growing economic and geopolitical power, especially in Central Asia. Within the SCO, Moscow’s goal is to avoid becoming a junior partner to Beijing while still cooperating on mutual interests.
- Avoiding Chinese Dominance: Russia uses the SCO as a platform to influence Chinese behavior in the region and push for multipolarity, rather than unipolarity centered on Beijing.
- For Russia, the SCO is both a platform of necessity and of strategic calculation. While Moscow recognizes the utility of cooperation with Beijing on issues like regional stability and opposition to Western influence, it is equally wary of becoming a junior partner in an organization increasingly tilted toward Chinese interests.
- Multipolar Narrative: The SCO helps Russia promote its vision of a multipolar world order that challenges Western dominance, which aligns with China’s rhetoric but differs in execution.
- Preserving Influence in Central Asia: Central Asia is a key geopolitical interest for both countries. Russia aims to keep its traditional influence in the region from being overtaken by China’s economic power.
- Military and Security Leadership: Russia promotes its Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) as the main security guarantor in Central Asia, keeping hard security issues largely under Russian leadership rather than SCO.
- Promoting Russian-language media, education, financial support, and labor migration, in order to maintain Moscow’s Soft-Power influence in Central Asia.
- Economic Rivalry: China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has outpaced Russian-led projects like the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Russia uses the SCO to ensure it still has a seat at the table for regional economic integration, even though China often dominates these discussions.
- Counterbalancing the West: Both Russia and China use the SCO as a tool to oppose what they view as Western interference in their internal affairs and regional matters.
- Anti-Western rhetoric: The SCO provides a platform for Moscow and Beijing to issue joint statements criticizing NATO expansion, U.S. sanctions, and Western-led interventions.
- Eastern-coalition Solidarity: Russia supports China’s non-interference policy, which protects both governments from “international criticism regarding human rights and internal governance”.
- Security and Counterterrorism Cooperation: Russia and China both emphasize the SCO’s role in combating the “three evils”: terrorism, separatism, and extremism.
- Joint Military Drills: Russia participates in SCO-led exercises with China to promote interoperability and display strength.
- Regional Security: Russia uses the SCO’s Regional Anti-Terrorist Structure (RATS), headquartered in Tashkent, to maintain relevance in security cooperation while avoiding China’s full dominance in this sphere.
- Managing India and Pakistan: Russia supports the inclusion of India and Pakistan in the SCO to diversify its membership and dilute China’s influence.
- Multipolar Balancing: By supporting India’s entry, Russia introduced a counterweight to China, aligning with its goal of maintaining balance.
- Mediator Role: Russia can act as a broker between rivals like India and China, or India and Pakistan, enhancing its diplomatic relevance.
- “Limiting” SCO’s Institutional Power: Russia has been cautious about deepening institutional integration within the SCO.
- No NATO-like structure: Moscow resists making the SCO a military alliance, as that could give China more leverage or entangle Russia in unwanted conflicts.
- Prefer informal cooperation: Russia promotes flexible, issue-based cooperation rather than legally binding frameworks that could limit its freedom of action.
- Using Russia’s historical, linguistic, and cultural ties with Central Asia to maintain informal influence not easily measurable in economic terms.
- Russia’s long-term strategy is less about aligning permanently with China and more about carving out autonomous influence while avoiding entrapment in Chinese-led regional designs. For Russia, the ideal SCO is one where power is balanced and cooperation is pragmatic.
The Future of the SCO: Cooperative, But Cautious:
As the global order shifts, the SCO will likely grow in influence – But not in unity. Russia will continue to promote its role as a broker, not a follower, using careful diplomacy to shape the organization’s trajectory without letting it become a tool of Chinese ambition.
The Path Forward: Strategic Adaptation: Three potential futures emerge for Russia in the SCO:
- The Strategic Balancer: Russia maintains its broker role by deepening ties with Central Asia, India, and Iran, using its security clout and diplomatic experience to mediate tensions and resist Chinese overreach.
- The Co-leader with China: A less likely but possible scenario in which Russia accepts a junior position in exchange for economic and political support – risky given long-term sovereignty costs.
- The Marginalized Bystander: If geopolitical challenges overwhelm its Foreign Policy, Russia could retreat from multilateral leadership and watch the SCO evolve under China’s direction.
The likeliest future lies somewhere between balancer and tactical cooperator, requiring nimble diplomacy, regional outreach, and internal reforms.
Strategic Recommendation for Russian Policy within the SCO: To avoid the trap of marginalization, Russia must pursue strategic adaptation. That means:
- Revitalizing its Eurasian vision beyond security—particularly in tech, energy transition, and trade corridors.
- Investing in multilateral diplomacy with SCO partners, especially smaller Central Asian states who still value balanced engagement.
- Deepen trade and security partnerships with India, Turkey, Gulf states, and Southeast Asia, using SCO dialogue partnerships as entry points.
- Engaging India, Pakistan and Iran more deliberately in order to shape a multipolar consensus within the SCO.
- Position the SCO as a cultural and ideological counterpoint to Western liberalism, emphasizing sovereignty, conservatism, and Eurasian traditions.
- Fund SCO youth forums, academic networks, and cultural exchanges through Russian institutions.
- Lead the development of SCO-wide media collaboration platforms, with a base in Moscow or other Russian cities.
Comments