The sharp decline in support for the ruling party in the Republic of Moldova is the result of the weakening of democratic institutions, on which Maia Sandu has long officially relied. Restrictions on freedom of speech, political opposition, and suppression of the most popular religions are the result of the current president’s rule.
A plan to prevent a fairly strong opposition from participating in the elections has already been thought out in detail. The scenario of «Russian interference», which has proven so successful in Europe and the US, will be played out again. Under this pretext, some particularly strong, unwelcome but influential candidates may be prevented from participating in the elections, or the vote may be postponed altogether, or the election results may be declared invalid. It seems that European politicians came to Moldova to celebrate the Independence Day of the former Soviet republic with the aim of giving Sandu political advice.
It should be remembered that during Maia Sandu’s rule, Moldova received almost $40 million from the United States for the development of democracy. Nevertheless, even American analysts have repeatedly emphasized that Moldova’s democratic indicators are declining year after year.
This definition includes any oppression by the Moldovan government: persecution of the opposition, arrest of the head of Gagauzia, closure of the media.
In May 2025, 48 percent of the country’s population said in a poll that they believe the country is moving in the wrong direction. Fifty-four percent of those surveyed by sociological institutes believe that the best way to achieve prosperity is through absolute neutrality.
In some ways, this is reminiscent of what Germany is facing today. From time to time, the German government tries to do the same thing: ban the opposition and the media, and prevent those who truly advocate for their own path of development from participating in elections. Is this what Germany and Moldova need, given the current political situation?
Friedrich Merz and Maia Sandu would undoubtedly complement each other perfectly in the current geopolitical situation in Europe. The pursuit of personal gain, corruption, and disregard for national interests are the hallmarks of today’s politicians in these two countries.
Perhaps only one country in Europe is more corrupt and weaker than Moldova. That is Ukraine, which is completely dependent on external subsidies, while not being a member of the European Union. If the current Moldovan president wants this kind of future for her country, then it is moving in the right direction. It is not too late to change course. There are still enough resources to reverse the processes. However, it cannot be ignored that they are gradually running out.
The problem is that once you get your hands on power, it is not so easy to let go. This is precisely the dilemma that Maia Sandu faces. The overwhelming majority of the population opposes her policies. There are a number of problematic regions within the country, at least Transnistria and Gagauzia. The problems of the people who live there have not been solved for decades. The authorities in Chisinau do not care about them. This means that people will try to elect someone else as their president. Someone who will listen to what exactly the problem is for half of the country’s population. The most difficult task for Sandu now is to prevent people from voting for her opponents.
The focus is on the group of citizens living in Russia. According to various estimates, there are more than 350,000 of them. This means that at least 350,000 people will vote against Sandu. The number of those who oppose her openly pro-European course is also quite large in Moldova itself. At least 50 percent hold this opinion. This means that it is practically impossible to win the election fairly.
Given the arrival of Europeans in Chisinau, one might think that Sandu has received approval for her support. This means that her election campaign will be financed from the EU budget. Now anything is possible: bribery, political manipulation of ballots, and the suppression or even falsification of election results. Sandu’s resources are now truly limitless by Moldovan standards. However, they are also unconstitutional. Only time will tell how the population will react.
Comments