Jeffrey Sachs Insulted The EU’s Leaders, And Obama & Biden

US-Sachs-EU-parliament-speech
Professor Jeffrey Sachs’ speech in the European Parliament at an event titled “The Geopolitics of Peace”,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD_KEFpuIro

“Jeffrey Sachs EU Parliament Explosive Speech Shakes Europe and Middle East; VIDEO GOES VIRAL!”

He tells them to their face, that they’ve all been lying to their public, regarding the war in Ukraine, and that Russia inevitably will not allow U.S. missiles to be placed in the country, Ukraine, that has the nearest-border-of-all to The Kremlin, a mere 317 miles (510 km) away from blitz-nuking Russia’s central command in The Kremlin, just as, in 1962, JFK had refused to allow the Soviet Union to place its missiles in Cuba a mere 1,131 miles away from America’s central command in Washington, DC.

He called out the lying Western ‘news’-media for their having trumpeted to their audiences uncritically their Government’s lies as-if those were or even MIGHT BE truths — NO superpower would EVER allow ANOTHER SUPERpower to do to it what the U.S. Government insists upon doing to Russia.

He condemned the war-mongering DC-beltway profiteers and agents of their country’s war-industries, because they (and the Governments whose lies they praise as truths) place the entire world’s future in the most severe jeopardy, of an actual WW3 resulting.

His 28-minute-long speech — delivered without any pre-written text and even without notes — SPILLED THE BEANS not ONLY to them (who already know everything he said, because they all had PARTICIPATED in it) but to the broader world public (via any news-medium that will now be reporting this — if any will); and, so, in order to make this presentation of this historic speech not only in audio and visual form, but also to read and think about (in the auto-generated youtube transcript, which I have cleaned up so as to be easier-to-read), here is that transcript:

0:04

You always say it’s not our fault,

0:06

they’re the aggressor, they’re the other

0:08

side, they’re Hitler that comes up every

0:11

two or three years whether it’s Saddam

0:14

Hussein whether it’s Assad whether it’s

0:16

Putin, That’s very

0:18

convenient, that’s the only foreign

0:20

policy explanation the American people

0:23

are ever given

0:26

anywhere. Well, we’re facing Munich 1930;

0:30

well we’re facing Munich 1938, can’t talk

0:33

to the other side, they’re evil,

0:35

implacable

0:37

foes. That’s the only model of foreign

0:40

policy we ever hear from our mass media,

0:45

and the mass media repeats it entirely,

0:48

because it’s completely suborned by the

0:50

US

0:52

government. Now, in

0:56

2014, the

0:58

US worked actively to overthrow

1:02

Yanukovich; everybody knows the intercepted

1:05

call by my Columbia

1:07

University colleague Victoria

1:10

Nuland and the US ambassador Peter [actually Geoffrey]

1:14

Pyatt — [now he plays the recording:] “can’t remember if I told you this or

1:16

if I only told Washington this, that when

1:18

I talked to Jeff Feltman this morning, he

1:21

had a new name for the U.N. guy, Robert

1:23

Serry, did I write you that, this morning?

1:26

Yeah. I saw that he’s now gotten both

1:29

Serry and Ban ki-Moon to agree that Serry

1:32

could come in Monday or Tuesday.

1:36

That would be great, I think to help glue

1:38

this thing, and to have the U.N. help glue it,

1:40

and, you know: fuck the EU.”

[Here, Pyatt interjected:] “No, exactly, and

1:44

I think we’ve got to do something to

1:45

make it stick together because you can

1:47

be pretty sure that if it does if it

1:49

does start to gain altitude, the Russians

1:51

will be working behind the scenes to try

1:53

to torpedo it.” [END OF THAT RECORDING.] You don’t get better

1:56

evidence. The Russians intercepted her

1:59

call and put it on the internet. Listen

2:02

to it. It’s

2:03

fascinating. I know all these

2:06

people, by the way. By doing that [in the Obama Administration], they all

2:09

got promoted in the Biden

2:12

Administration. That’s the job. Now, when

2:16

the Maidan occurred, I was called

2:20

immediately — “Oh, Professor Sachs, the new

2:23

Ukrainian prime minister would like to

2:25

see you to talk about the economic

2:28

crisis,”

2:30

because I’m pretty good at

2:32

that. And so I flew to

2:35

Kiev, and I was walked around the

2:38

Maidan, and I was told how the U.S. paid

2:42

the money for all the people around the

2:45

Maidan —

2:48

‘spontaneous revolution of

2:51

dignity’, Ladies and Gentlemen.

2:54

Please, where do all these media Outlets

2:57

come from where does all this

2:59

organization come from, where do all

3:02

these buses come from, where do all these

3:04

people called in come from? Are you

3:07

kidding? This is organized

3:12

effort,

3:14

and it’s not a

3:17

secret except to citizens of Europe and

3:21

the United States. Everyone else

3:23

understands it quite

3:26

clearly. Then came Minsk

3:30

and especially Minsk

3:32

2 — which, by the way, was modeled on South

3:36

Teheran

3:38

autonomy — and the Belgians could have

3:41

related to Minsk 2 very well. It said there

3:45

should be autonomy for the Russian

3:48

speaking regions in the east of

3:51

Ukraine. It was supported unanimously by

3:55

the U.N. Security

3:57

Council. The United States

4:00

and Ukraine decided it was not to be

4:04

enforced. Germany and France, which were

4:07

the guarantors of the Normandy

4:10

process, let it

4:13

go, and it was absolutely another direct

4:19

American unipolar action with Europe as

4:23

usual playing a

4:25

completely useless subsidiary role even

4:29

though it was a the guarantor of the

4:32

agreement. Trump one [first-term] raised the

4:37

armaments. There were many thousands of

4:40

deaths in the shelling by Ukraine in the

4:43

Donbass. There was no Minsk 2

4:47

agreement. And then, Biden came into

4:50

office, and, again, I know all these people.

4:54

I used to be a member of the Democratic

4:57

Party. I now am

5:00

strictly sworn to be a member of no

5:04

party, because both are the same

5:08

anyway, and because this is I the

5:12

Democrats [who’ve] become complete warmongers

5:14

over time, and there not was not one

5:18

voice about peace, just like most of your

5:22

parliamentarians the same

5:25

way. So, at the end of 1991,

5:32

Putin put on the table a last effort in

5:37

two security agreement drafts, one with

5:40

Europe and one with the United States.

5:42

the U.S. [one was] put on the table December

5:44

15th in

5:48

2021. I had an hour call with Jake

5:51

Sullivan in the White House,

5:54

begging Jake, avoid the

5:57

war, you can avoid the war. All you

6:01

have to do is say NATO will not enlarge

6:04

to

6:06

Ukraine. And he said to me, oh, NATO’s not

6:09

going to enlarge to Ukraine, don’t worry

6:11

about it. I said, Jake, say it publicly. No

6:16

no no we can’t say it publicly. Say, Jake,

6:19

you’re going to have a war over

6:22

something that isn’t even going to

6:24

happen? He said don’t worry Jeff, there

6:27

will be no war.

6:30

These are not very bright

6:33

people I’m telling you. If I can give you

6:37

my honest view they’re not very bright

6:39

people and I dealt with them for more

6:41

than 40

6:42

years. They talk to themselves, they don’t

6:46

talk to anybody else. They play game

6:49

theory in non-cooperative Game Theory:

6:51

you don’t talk to the other side, you

6:54

just make your

6:56

strategy. This is the essence of Game

6:58

Theory.

7:02

It’s not negotiation Theory. iI’s not

7:06

peacemaking

7:07

Theory. It is unilateral

7:11

non-cooperative theory. If you know

7:13

formal Game Theory, that’s what they play.

7:16

It started at the Rand Corporation.

7:18

That’s what they still play. In 2019,

7:21

there’s a paper by Rand, How do we

7:24

extend Russia, do you know they wrote a paper,

7:27

which Biden followed. How do we annoy

7:31

Russia — that’s literally the strategy — how

7:35

do we annoy Russia — we’re trying to

7:38

provoke it, trying to make it break apart,

7:40

maybe have regime change, maybe have

7:42

unrest, maybe have economic

7:45

crisis. That’s what you call your

7:49

ally. Are you

7:53

[Music]

7:54

kidding? So, I had a long and frustrating

7:59

phone call with

8:01

Sullivan. I was standing out in the freezing

8:04

cold. I happened to be trying to have a

8:08

ski

8:09

day, and there I was. Jake don’t have the

8:13

war! Oh, there’ll be no war,

8:16

Jeff. We know a lot of what happened the

8:19

next month, which is that they refuse to

8:24

negotiate. The stupidest idea of NATO is

8:28

the so-called Open Door

8:30

policy. Are you kidding? NATO reserves the

8:34

right to go where it wants without any

8:38

neighbor having any say

8:41

whatsoever. Well, I tell the Mexicans and

8:44

the Canadians, don’t try it. You

8:48

know Trump may want to take over Canada,

8:52

so Canada could say to China why don’t

8:54

you build a military base uh in uh in in

8:58

Ontario?

9:00

I wouldn’t advise

9:02

it, and the United States would not say,

9:05

Well, it’s an open door, that’s their

9:07

business. I mean they can do what they

9:09

want that’s not our

9:11

business. But grown-ups in Europe repeat

9:15

this in Europe, in your Commission your

9:20

High

9:22

Representative. This is nonsense stuff.

9:25

This is not even baby geopolitics.

9:30

This is just not thinking at

9:33

all. So, the war started, What was Putin’s

9:37

intention in the war? I can tell you what

9:41

his intention was. It was to force

9:45

Zelensky to

9:47

negotiate

9:49

neutrality, and that happened within 7

9:53

days of the start of the

9:56

invasion. You should understand this, not

10:00

the propaganda that’s written about this.

10:02

Oh, that they failed, and he was going to

10:04

take over

10:06

Ukraine. Come on, Ladies and

10:09

Gentlemen. Understand something — [the]

10:11

basic the idea was to keep NATO — and what

10:16

is NATO it’s the United

10:18

States — off of Russia’s

10:21

border, no more no

10:24

less. I should add one very important

10:29

point.

10:30

Why are they so interested? First because

10:34

if China or Russia decided to have a

10:37

military base on the Rio Grand or in uh

10:42

the Canadian border not only will the

10:44

United States freak out we’d have War

10:47

within about 10

10:49

minutes. But because the United States

10:52

unilaterally abandoned the

10:54

anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002

10:58

and ended the nuclear arms control

11:01

framework by doing

11:03

so — and this is extremely important to

11:07

understand — the nuclear arms control

11:10

framework is based on trying to block a

11:13

first

11:14

strike. The ABM Treaty was a critical

11:18

component of that the US unilaterally

11:20

walked out of the ABM Treaty in

11:23

2002. It blew a Russian gasket, so

11:27

everything I’ve been describing is in

11:28

the context of the destruction of the

11:31

nuclear framework as well. And starting

11:34

in 2010, the US put in Aegis-Ashore missile

11:37

systems in Poland and then in

11:41

Romania, and Russia doesn’t like that, and

11:45

one of the issues on the table in

11:47

December and January, December 2021

11:50

January 2022, was does the United States

11:54

claim the right to put missile systems

11:56

in Ukraine, and Blinken told Lavrovn in

12:01

January 2022: the United States reserves

12:04

the right to put missile missile systems

12:07

wherever it

12:10

. That’s

12:12

your putative

12:15

ally. And now let’s put intermediate

12:18

missile systems back in Germany. The

12:20

United States walked out of the INF

12:22

treaty unilaterally in 2019. There is no

12:26

nuclear arms framework right now,

12:32

none. When Zelensky said in seven days

12:37

let’s

12:38

negotiate, I know the details of

12:41

this

12:43

exquisitly, because I’ve talked to all

12:47

the parties in

12:48

detail. Within a couple of weeks there

12:52

was a document

12:54

exchanged that President Putin had

12:56

approved that Lavro had presented,

12:59

that was being managed by the Turkish

13:02

mediators. I flew to Ankara to listen in

13:06

detail to what the mediators were

13:10

doing. Ukraine walked away unilaterally

13:14

from a near

13:17

agreement. Why? Because the United States

13:21

told them

13:22

to. Because the

13:25

UK added icing to the cake by having

13:30

BoJo go in early

13:33

April to Ukraine and explain, and he has

13:38

recently, and if your security is in the

13:41

hands of Boris Johnson, God help us

13:44

all. Keir Starmer turns out to be even

13:47

worse. It’s

13:49

unimaginable but it is

13:54

true. Boris Johnson has explained and you

13:57

can look it up

14:00

on the website that what’s at stake here

14:03

is Western

14:05

hegemony, not Ukraine. Western

14:11

hegemony. And I met at the Vatican

14:14

with a group in the spring of

14:17

2022 where we wrote a document

14:21

explaining nothing good can come out of

14:23

this war for Ukraine — negotiate now —

14:27

because anything that takes time will

14:28

mean

14:29

massive amounts of deaths, risk of

14:32

nuclear escalation, and likely loss of

14:37

the

14:38

war. I wouldn’t change one word from what

14:41

we wrote then. Nothing was wrong in that

14:44

document, and since that document, since

14:47

the U.S. talked the negotiators away from

14:50

the

14:51

table, about a million Ukrainians have

14:54

died or been severely

14:57

wounded, and the American Senators who

15:00

are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as

15:06

imaginable, say this is wonderful

15:08

expenditure of our money because no

15:10

Americans are

15:12

dying. It’s the pure proxy war, one of our

15:16

Senators nearby me, uh,

15:19

Blumenthal, says this out

15:22

loud. Mitt Romney says this out loud. It’s

15:26

best money America can spend — no Americans

15:29

are

15:30

dying. It’s

15:33

unreal. Now, just to bring us up to

15:39

yesterday, this failed, this project

15:43

failed, the idea of the project, was that

15:46

Russia would fold its

15:48

hand, the idea all along was Russia can’t

15:52

resist as Zbigniew Brzezinski explained in

15:57

1997, the Americans, we have the upper

16:00

hand, we’re going to win because we’re

16:04

going to bluff them, they’re not really

16:06

going to fight, they’re not really going

16:08

to

16:09

mobilize. The nuclear option of cutting

16:12

them out of

16:14

Swift that’s going to do them in. The

16:18

economic sanctions — that’s going to do

16:20

them

16:22

in. The Himars, that’s going to do them in.

16:25

The attacks the F-16s.

16:31

Honestly, I’ve listened to this for 70

16:34

years. I’ve listened to it as semi

16:37

understanding, I’d say, for about 56 years.

16:41

They speak nonsense. Every day my

16:45

country, my

16:47

government, this is so familiar to

16:50

me, completely familiar, I begged the

16:54

Ukrainians and I had a track record with

16:56

the Ukrainians. I advised the Ukrainians,

16:58

I’m not anti-Ukrainian, I am pro-ukrainian

17:01

completely. I said save your lives, save

17:04

your sovereignty, save your territory, be

17:07

neutral, don’t listen to the

17:10

Americans. I repeated to them the famous

17:13

adage of Henry Kissinger that to be an

17:16

enemy of the United States is dangerous

17:19

but to be a friend is

17:22

fatal. Okay, so let me REPEAT that for

17:25

Europe: to be an enemy of the United

17:27

States is dangerous

17:29

but to be a friend is

17:32

fatal. The idea all along was Russia

17:35

can’t resist as Zbigniew Brzezinski explained

17:39

in

17:40

1997. The Americans thought we have the

17:43

upper

17:44

hand, we’re going to win because we’re

17:47

going to bluff them, they’re not really

17:50

going to fight. They’re not really going

17:52

to

17:53

mobilize the nuclear option of cutting

17:56

them out of Swift,

17:59

that’s going to do them in. The economic

18:02

sanctions that’s going to do them

18:06

in. The Himars that’s going to do them in.

18:09

The ATACMS the

18:14

F-16s. Honestly, I’ve listened to this for

18:17

70 years. I’ve listened to it as semi

18:21

understanding I’d say for about 56 years.

18:25

They speak nonsense every day. My

18:29

country, my

18:31

government, this is so familiar to

18:34

me. Completely familiar. I begged the

18:38

Ukrainians and I had a track record with

18:40

the Ukrainians. I advised the Ukrainians,

18:42

I’m not anti-Ukrainian I’m Pro Ukrainian

18:45

completely. I said save your lives save

18:48

your sovereignty save your territory be

18:51

neutral don’t listen to the

18:53

Americans I repeated to them the famous

18:57

adage of Henry messenger that to be an

19:00

enemy of the United States is dangerous

19:03

but to be a friend is

19:06

fatal okay so let me repeat that for

19:09

Europe: to be an enemy of the United

19:11

States is dangerous but to be a friend

19:14

is

19:17

fatal. So, let me now finalize a few words

19:22

about

19:26

Trump. Trump does not want the losing

19:31

hand. This is

19:34

why it is more likely than not this war

19:37

will

19:39

end, because Trump and President Putin

19:43

will agree to end the

19:45

war. If Europe does all its great

19:50

warmongering, it doesn’t matter. The war

19:53

is

19:54

ending, so get it out of your system.

19:59

please tell your

20:01

colleagues it’s

20:03

over, and it’s over because Trump doesn’t

20:08

want to carry a

20:10

loser that’s — it it’s not some great

20:14

morality — he doesn’t want to carry a

20:17

loser. This is a

20:19

loser. The one that will be saved by the

20:22

negotiations taking place right now is

20:26

Ukraine, second is Europe, your stock

20:29

market’s rising in recent Days by the

20:32

horrible news of negotiations. I know

20:36

this has been met with the sheer horror

20:38

in these

20:40

chambers, but this is the best

20:42

news that you could

20:45

get now. I

20:47

encouraged — they don’t listen to me but I

20:51

tried — to reach out to some of the

20:53

European leaders. Most don’t want to hear

20:56

anything from me at all,

20:59

but I

21:01

said don’t go to

21:03

Kiev, go to

21:06

Moscow, discuss with your

21:09

counterparts — are you kidding? You’re

21:11

Europe, you’re 450 million people, your 20

21:16

trillion euro

21:17

economy, you should be the main economic

21:22

trading partner of Russia — it’s natural!

21:26

Links,

21:28

by the way, if anyone would like to

21:31

discuss how the U.S. blew up Nordstream,

21:33

I’d be happy to talk about

21:39

that.

21:41

So, the Trump Administration is

21:45

imperialist at

21:47

heart, it is a great

21:51

Powers dominate the

21:54

world, it is we will do what we want when

21:57

we can,

21:59

we will be better than a

22:04

senecent Biden, and we’ll cut our losses

22:07

where we have

22:10

to, there are several war zones in the

22:13

world, the Middle East being another, we

22:16

don’t know what will happen with that.

22:18

Again, if Europe had a proper policy you

22:22

could stop that war, I’ll explain

22:26

how, but war with China is also a

22:32

possibility [that Trump is considering], so I’m not saying that we’re

22:35

at the new age of

22:38

peace but we are in a

22:42

uh very uh different kind of politics

22:47

right

22:47

now, and Europe should have a foreign

22:51

policy, and not just a foreign policy of

22:55

Russophobia [but] a foreign policy that is a

22:57

realistic foreign policy that

23:00

understands Russia’s situation that

23:02

understands Europe’s situation, that

23:04

understands what America is and what it

23:06

stands

23:07

for, that tries

23:10

to avoid Europe being invaded by the

23:13

United

23:15

States, because it’s not impossible that

23:18

America will just land troops in Danish

23:23

territory. I’m not

23:25

joking, and I don’t think they’re joking,

23:28

and Europe needs a foreign policy, a real

23:32

one, not a yes we’ll bargain with Mr

23:37

Trump and meet him

23:39

halfway, you know what that will be like.

23:43

Give me a call

23:47

afterwards. Please don’t have American

23:51

officials as head of Europe, have

23:54

European

23:56

officials please

23:59

have a European foreign

24:01

policy. You’re going to be living with

24:03

Russia for a long

24:04

time, so please negotiate with

24:08

Russia. There are real security issues on

24:11

the

24:12

table, but the bombast and the

24:17

Russophobia is not serving your security

24:20

at all, it’s not serving Ukraine’s security

24:23

at all, and it contributed to a million

24:26

casualties in Ukraine from this

24:29

idiotic American adventure that you

24:32

signed on to and then became the lead

24:34

cheerleaders

24:36

of. Solves

24:41

nothing. On the Middle East, by the

24:45

way, the

24:47

U.S. completely handed over foreign policy

24:50

to Netanyahu 30 years ago. The Israel

24:54

Lobby dominates American politics, just

24:58

have no doubt about it. I could explain

25:02

for hours how it works, it’s very

25:06

dangerous, I’m hoping that Trump will not

25:09

destroy his

25:11

administration and worse the Palestinian

25:14

people because of Netanyahu, who I regard

25:18

as a war

25:20

criminal, uh properly indicted by the

25:25

ICC, and that needs to be told know more

25:29

that there will be a state of Palestine

25:32

on the borders of the 4th of June

25:35

1967 according to international law as

25:38

the only way for peace it’s the only way

25:42

for Europe to have peace on your borders

25:46

with the Middle East is the two-state

25:49

solution. There is only one obstacle to

25:52

it by the way and that is the veto of

25:55

the United States and the UN Security

25:57

Council

25:59

so if you want to have some influence

26:01

tell the United States, drop the

26:04

veto, you are together with 180 countries

26:08

in the

26:09

world. The only ones that oppose a

26:13

Palestinian state

26:15

are the United States, Israel

26:20

Micronesia Nauru

26:23

Papua New

26:25

Guinea, Mr. Malay,

26:29

and

26:32

Paraguay. So, this is a place where Europe

26:34

could have a big influence. Europe has

26:39

gone silent about the JCPOA and

26:42

Iran. Netanyahu’s greatest dream in life

26:46

is a war between the United States and

26:48

Iran. He’s not given up, and it’s not

26:51

impossible that that would come

26:54

also, and that’s because the U.S. in this

26:58

regard does not have an independent

27:00

foreign policy — it is run by Israel. It’s

27:05

tragic, it’s amazing by the

27:08

way, and it could end. Trump may say that

27:14

he wants foreign policy back, maybe I’m

27:17

hoping that it’s the case. Finally, let me

27:20

just say with respect to China, China is

27:22

not an enemy, China is just a success

27:27

story, that’s why it is viewed by the

27:30

United States as an enemy, because China

27:34

is a bigger economy than the United

27:38

States that’s

27:42

[Applause]

27:51

all. Thanks.

27:57

[Applause]

——

So, he informed and documented that the U.S. Government is destroying their countries and destroying perhaps even ultimately the entire world, and that if they have any reason at all for hope, it can come ONLY by their recognizing that Russia is one of them, and that America — as it has been ever since it started the Cold War — is NOT.

As regards the central matter, which is Ukraine, it is obvious that once Russia is included as being European (and the largest European country), Ukraine likewise will be. America is only Europe’s enemy, and Sachs documented that quite well. Anyone who wants to see lots more documentation of what he said about the war in Ukraine, can see that here.

PS: If you like this article, please email it to all your friends or otherwise let others know about it. None of the U.S.-and-allied ‘news’-media will likely publish it (nor link to it, since doing that might also hurt them with Google or etc.). I am not asking for money, but I am asking my readers to spread my articles far and wide, because I specialize in documenting what the Deep State is constantly hiding — what the ‘news’-media ignore if they can, and deny if they must. This is, in fact, today’s samizdat.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*