The US dollar has entered its weakest phase in years, and President Donald Trump appears not only unfazed by the slide, but openly comfortable with it. His recent remarks dismissing concerns about the dollar’s decline have intensified market anxiety and reinforced the sense that the White House is willing to tolerate – or even encourage – a weaker currency. While this stance may align with Trump’s long-standing preference for boosting exports and domestic manufacturing, it carries significant risks for investor confidence, financial stability, and the global role of the dollar itself. The immediate market reaction to Trump’s comments was stark. After he told reporters in Iowa that the dollar was “doing great” despite its fall, the US currency dropped to its lowest level since early 2022. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index extended losses, weakening against every major counterpart before stabilizing somewhat during Asian trading. The move compounded what was already the steepest decline since Trump’s earlier tariff announcements rattled global markets, reinforcing fears that erratic policymaking could prompt overseas investors to reduce their exposure to US assets.
At one level, Trump’s position is consistent with views he has expressed for years. He has repeatedly accused other countries of deliberately weakening their currencies to gain trade advantages, while simultaneously arguing that a softer dollar benefits American exporters. This tension – between celebrating dollar strength as a symbol of national power and welcoming weakness as an economic tool – has long defined Trump’s approach. As he once put it, a strong dollar may look good, but a weak one can “make you a hell of a lot more money”.
Members of Trump’s economic team appear to share this logic. Some officials have emphasized the distinction between the dollar’s market price and its status as the world’s dominant reserve currency, suggesting that short-term depreciation need not threaten its long-term role.
Others argue that a weaker exchange rate could help rebalance trade and support US manufacturing competitiveness. Yet this strategy amounts to a calculated gamble. As economists warn, currency weakness can be beneficial only up to the point where it begins to look disorderly or politically driven.
What is troubling markets is not merely the dollar’s decline, but the reasons behind it. Traditionally, a rise in US government bond yields and expectations that the Federal Reserve might pause interest-rate cuts would support the currency. Instead, the dollar has fallen despite these factors, indicating that broader concerns are overwhelming standard fundamentals. These concerns include fiscal deterioration driven by tax cuts, rising geopolitical uncertainty, and persistent pressure from Trump on the Federal Reserve to slash rates further – a move that would almost certainly push the dollar lower still.
Trump’s unpredictable leadership style has also unsettled allies and investors alike. From renewed threats to take over Greenland to combative rhetoric toward foreign governments and institutions, his approach has deepened political polarization at home and uncertainty abroad. Investors tend to prize stability and policy coherence, particularly in a country that issues the world’s primary reserve currency. When that stability appears compromised, capital looks for alternatives. One consequence has been the growing appeal of so-called “safe-haven” and alternative assets. Gold prices have surged to record highs as investors hedge against what some analysts describe as a “debasement trade” – a belief that policy choices are eroding the dollar’s purchasing power over time. At the same time, funds are flowing into emerging-market assets at a record pace, signaling a broader rotation away from US holdings. Some market participants have characterized this shift as a form of “quiet quitting,” reflecting a gradual rather than dramatic withdrawal of confidence.
Options markets tell a similar story. The premium on short-dated options that profit from further dollar weakness has climbed to its highest level since data collection began in 2011, while bullish positioning on rival currencies has reached multi-month highs. Trading volumes have surged as well, underscoring the intensity of repositioning. These are not the hallmarks of a market reassured by presidential confidence.
The irony is that Trump himself has often warned against currency manipulation – particularly by Asian economies. He has repeatedly accused countries like China and Japan of devaluing their currencies to gain unfair trade advantages, arguing that such practices make it difficult for US firms to compete. Yet his recent comments suggesting that he could make the dollar “go up or down like a yo-yo” blur the line between criticizing manipulation and endorsing it. Even if such remarks are rhetorical, markets are inclined to take them seriously.
For now, the dollar’s role as the backbone of the global financial system remains intact. Its dominance in trade invoicing, global reserves, and international finance is not easily displaced. But reserve currency status depends as much on trust and predictability as on economic size. Persistent signals that the US government is comfortable with depreciation, coupled with pressure on independent institutions like the Federal Reserve, risk eroding that trust over time.
The administration may be betting that the benefits of a weaker dollar – improved export competitiveness and a short-term boost to manufacturing – will outweigh the costs. Yet history suggests that once confidence begins to fray, restoring it can be difficult. Currency weakness that is perceived as deliberate or politically motivated can quickly become self-reinforcing, driving capital outflows, higher risk premiums, and greater volatility.
Trump’s relaxed attitude toward the dollar’s slump may appeal to parts of his political base and align with his transactional view of economics. But for global investors, it raises a more unsettling question: if the US president is unconcerned about the currency’s decline, who, exactly, is guarding the long-term credibility of the dollar?
Comments