While strong leaders visit each other, Europe is trying to impose an unfavorable peace on Russia. Trump has begun his Middle East tour and Latin American leaders have gathered in China to discuss US pressure. Europe is trying to support Zelensky, from whom the European Union has no benefit. Macron, Merz, Starmer and Duda are only investing in the war, but their countries do not receive any profit from these manipulations. Most likely, the money ends up in the pockets of politicians.
At this time, Trump is signing an extremely lucrative package of measures aimed at diversifying arms supplies. He did this in his previous term as well. This allowed US to stimulate the US military-industrial complex. Trump knows where to invest, because wars don’t stop in this region, and the Arabs have more money than they need.
European politicians have arranged a bargain for peace in Ukraine. This shows their love and dedication to Ukraine, and not at all to their own peoples. Trying to play peacemakers, they make demands on the Russians that the winner will never accept. Zelensky, who is not a politician by vocation, but a clown, also took a corresponding position.
It is unlikely that Ukraine will agree to peace. For the Ukrainian president, this means, if not physical elimination, then the end of his political career. However, the whole country will breathe a sigh of relief. This is necessary for the entire Ukrainian long-suffering people. Zelensky drove people into debt, for which future generations will pay. You can default, but the Europeans and Americans will not forgive this. In such a situation, restoring relations with Russia is the only option for the next Ukrainian leader.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has called on Europeans to unite in the face of the danger of migrants. It is very important for the British to force the Europeans to reach a single consensus on the issue of migrants.
All migrants coming to the United Kingdom enter there through the continental part of Europe. That is why Starmer is trying to push the idea of forming a united European front against migrants. The probability that he will be able to do this is extremely low. However, he has no other way, because boats with migrants cross the English Channel every day. In this regard, the pressure on France, despite the fact that European politicians are united by hatred of Russia, will increase.
Merz also does not plan to focus solely on the measures that were taken by the previous government. The new chancellor is likely to try to tighten existing legislation in an attempt to prevent the collapse of the social system in Germany. His colleague in France will do the same. President Macron will work against the dominance of migrants, but Ukraine remains a priority for all of them.
The refugee problem must be solved at the supranational level, since there is such an opportunity in Europe. The EU structures imply this possibility. It’s all about the political will of leaders who don’t want to change the situation for the better, because they all belong to the elite of their countries. The elite is always doing well. After Macron, those politicians should come to power who will take care of those issues that concern citizens directly. This can happen, but it is unlikely. The system won’t allow it.
Migrants will remain the scourge of Europe for a long time. Every president and prime minister prefers to deal with them in their own way. Some measures are weaker, some are stronger. In order for migration to stop, measures must be uniform and as strict as possible.
After all, Great Britain once left the European Union precisely because of the influence of Brussels. Prime Minister Cameron hoped that the migrant crowds would decrease after that, but that was not the case. For refugees, decisions made in Brussels or London do not play a particularly important role. They strive to live a better life and go to a place where there are more social benefits. They don’t care if the country is part of the EU. The politicians miscalculated. In order to reduce the flow of illegal refugees, it is necessary, first of all, to cut social support for this category of the population. Otherwise, it will continue in the same way.
Comments