A lot of people in the Alternative Media community were taken aback by Russia and China’s decision to go along with the US-led UNSC sanctions on North Korea, especially considering that it was undertaken in the context of the US recently passing more anti-Russian sanctions and even threatening to sanction China too, which has created the perception that both countries “sold out” to the US. It just doesn’t make sense to some that these two multipolar Great Powers, who are presumably against the so-called “New World Order”, would do this. The reality, as it usually turns out to be, is a lot more complex than the simplistic arguments going around social media, and therefore deserves further elaboration so that individuals can independently make their minds up about what happened and why.
Before going any further, an important clarification needs to be made – although Russia and China are both multipolar Great Powers, they seek to gradually and stably reform the existing world order, not radically and chaotically change it like some so-called “super patriotic” pundits want to pretend. It’s the US which regularly throws global affairs into uncertainty in the hopes of destabilizing its rivals and carving out strategic inroads amidst the chaos, not Russia and China which prefer to engage in their long-term planning under conditions of global predictability. Given these strategic determinants influencing their decision makers, they’re already predisposed to disliking North Korea’s missile and nuclear tests, especially when they continue to occur in defiance of the existing UNSC sanctions that Moscow and Beijing approved of themselves.
Moreover, Russia and China won’t ever blindly support any state like North Korea just because the US is against it, nor will they ever be comfortable with such a country doing whatever it wants under these circumstances if its actions contribute to more instability. No value judgement is being expressed here, just a statement of facts about Russia and China’s state interests as gleaned from empirical evidence over the years. In the Northeast Asian context, North Korea’s missile and nuclear tests are creating the pretext to “justify” the US’ THAAD deployment to the peninsula, which Russia and China both consider as a latent threat to their nuclear second-strike capabilities with time, so from their perspective, it makes sense why they’d want to put multilateral pressure on North Korea to end these destabilizing activities.
What’s essentially occurred is that the US has succeeded in shaping the situation in such a way that Russia and China’s interests have largely converged with Washington’s own in tightening sanctions against North Korea, and that this is independent of the recent anti-Russian sanctions or the grandstanding threats to impose economic restrictions against China. The US exploited Russia and China’s strategic positions in favoring predictability and stability in convincing them to follow its lead in imposing new UNSC sanctions against North Korea, which also advances their own interests as described earlier and additionally provides a proverbial opening for them to work on the improvement of bilateral relations after falling into their current slump.
Whether one thinks that it was morally right or morally wrong, the fact remains that Russia and China approved the latest UNSC sanctions against North Korea because it corresponds to their grand strategic interests, not because they were forced to contradict them under American pressure.
The post presented is the partial transcript of the CONTEXT COUNTDOWN radio program on Sputnik News, aired on Friday Aug 11, 2017:
DISCLAIMER: The author writes for this publication in a private capacity which is unrepresentative of anyone or any organization except for his own personal views. Nothing written by the author should ever be conflated with the editorial views or official positions of any other media outlet or institution.
Pingback: Multipolar Sanctions on North Korea: Sell-Out or Strategic? – Counter Information
Pingback: Vers où va-t-on ?:Guerre de Corée Partie II : Pourquoi il est probable qu’elle se produira-et varia | actualitserlande
Pingback: Les sanctions multipolaires contre la Corée du Nord : capitulation ou coup stratégique ? | Réseau International
Pingback: The US’ Boast that NK Sanctions are Meant to Kill Puts RF and PRC on the Spot - Regional Rapport
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – Webstynx
Pingback: Believe that It Or Not, Bolton’s Ideal – North Korea Will Adhere to The “Libyan Design” – Viralmount
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” | peoples trust toronto
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right – North Korea Will Follow The "Libyan Model" | Daily Forex Circle
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – The Deplorable Patriots
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right - North Korea Will Follow The "Libyan Model" | StockTalk Journal
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” | Wall Street Vibes
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – ProTradingResearch
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” | Real Patriot News
Pingback: Croyez le Ou Non, Bolton bouton Droit de la Corée du Nord Va Suivre Le “Modèle Libyen” – forex-enligne-fr.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – TradingCheatSheet
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - Forex forexshaft.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – Forex news – Binary options
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - aroundworld24.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - forex-trading-profits.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – top10brokersbinaryoptions.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – Binarybrokersblog.com – binary options trade forex
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right - North Korea Will Follow The "Libyan Model" - Novus Vero
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – secretsforex.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – customchakra.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – forexoperate.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - forexdemoaccountfree.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton's Right – North Korea Will Follow The "Libyan Model" | verylost.me
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – forexreadymax.info
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - pustakaforex.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – comparforex.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – forex analytics forexpic.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” - entertainment-ask.com
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – open mind news
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” | Investing Daily News
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – TCNN: The Constitutional News Network
Pingback: Believe It Or Not, Bolton’s Right – North Korea Will Follow The “Libyan Model” – The Conservative Insider
Pingback: John Bolton Has Advocated the “Libyan Model” for North Korea’s Denuclearization. Is Pyongyang Surrendering its Deterrence Capabilities? – Viralmount
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace Or Is It A Set Up For War?
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace Or Is It A Set Up For War? – open mind news
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace Or Is It A Set Up For War? – anonymous
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace or Is It a Set up for War? – Viralmount
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace or Is It a Set up for War? – Counter Information
Pingback: Trump-Kim “New Washington Consensus” vs. China’s New Silk Road (China is the REAL Target) – Brutal Proof
Pingback: Is Trump-Kim Deal Really Peace Or Is It A Set Up For War? – TLAV Dev