On June 14, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a meeting with the leadership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, at which Russia‘s principled positions and the actual strategic course of the state on a global scale were outlined.
http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74285
The meeting was opened by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who emphasized that the Foreign Ministry is actively working to strengthen Russia‘s position in the international arena, ensure security and the most favorable external conditions for development, and its staff are committed to the closest interaction and coordination in carrying out a unified foreign policy course, which is determined by the President of Russia and which is fixed in the Concept of Foreign Policy the politics of our country.
The Minister used a term such as “global East“, which is listed together with the global South as a priority area. If the global South is a concept that the West actively uses to its advantage, primarily to continue neocolonial policy by other means, then the global East is a relatively new concept that includes Eurasia and part of the Pacific region, with the exception of Australia and Oceania. The President began his assessment with the current situation in global and regional affairs, where he noted that “more and more states are striving to strengthen sovereignty, self-sufficiency, national and cultural identity.“
He emphasized that today “the contours of a multipolar and multilateral world order are being formed, and this is an objective process. It reflects cultural and civilizational diversity, which, despite all attempts at artificial unification, is organically inherent in man.“ Vladimir Putin rightly noted that the desire for a multipolar and more just world order is in tune with the image of the future for the vast majority of the world‘s countries. In this context, BRICS was mentioned and the authorities were instructed (and representatives of other ministries and the Presidential administration were also present at the event) to continue working with partners to coordinate decisions in the field of politics, security and other areas of cooperation. The Western powers, led by the United States, were subjected to extensive criticism because they decided that “they have the right to independently determine how the world should be arranged.
The practical expression of this worldview was the project of unlimited expansion of the North Atlantic Bloc in space and time.“ Although Russia has pointed out since the 90s the fallacy of the course chosen by the elites of the West and offered constructive solutions, such attempts at dialogue have not found any response. And instead of working out approaches that would suit all sides, the West began gross interventions – in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and other places. The current extremely dangerous state of affairs is the result of the selfishness and arrogance of Western states, Putin recalled. And although the collapse of the Euro–Atlantic security system is obvious, Moscow offers to start from scratch. And, first of all, to form a new security system for Eurasia, the largest land mass in the world in political and economic terms. To do this, it is necessary to establish a dialogue with all potential participants in such a future security system.
To proceed from the fact that the future security architecture is open to all Eurasian countries that wish to participate in its creation. Europe, whose main threat is its critical and increasing, almost total dependence on the United States, can also still make the right decision and be on good terms with Russia. Then it can “preserve itself as one of the independent centers of world development and cultural and civilizational poles of the planet.“
But it is necessary to intensify the dialogue process between multilateral organizations already operating in Eurasia right now. These are the Union State, the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the Eurasian Economic Union, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Further, other influential Eurasian associations from Southeast Asia to the Middle East may join these processes in the future. However, in addition to the positive agenda in Putin‘s speech, there were also clear signals to the West. It was noted that the theft of Russian assets in the West will not go unpunished. Although it was not said how this would be done, it is obvious that Russia can use a number of effective tools.
The same agreement with Belgium on asset protection has not been broken and it has legal force, therefore Brussels is responsible for freezing most Russian assets in the Euroclear system. Although public opinion in Russia is that tougher measures are needed against the West, especially because of the actions in Ukraine. Actually, the topic of Ukraine sounded especially vivid in connection with the upcoming conference in Switzerland, called a trick to “put the discussion on the wrong track“ and denote the legitimacy of the Kiev authorities. Dmitry Medvedev called this conference nothing less than a “summit of the doomed.“ https://web.telegram.org/a/#-1001572748754
In general, Medvedev‘s comments on Putin‘s speech conveyed the essence of the head of state‘s speech quite vividly and succinctly.
Vladimir Putin made a number of specific proposals, including the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhia regions. Kiev should also officially declare that there are no plans to join NATO and confirm the status of a nuclear-weapon-free state. For its part, Russia is ready to guarantee the safe withdrawal of Ukrainian units and formations from Donbass. The process of peace negotiations can begin immediately, although there is a “peculiar legal situation, but there are legitimate authorities there, even in accordance with the constitution... It is the Verkhovna Rada that is now the legitimate body in Ukraine, unlike the executive branch... Zelensky‘s legitimacy cannot be restored by any means.“ It was emphasized that we are not talking about freezing the conflict, but about its final conclusion, and if the West and Kiev refuse, they will be responsible for further bloodshed. The basic agreements on a peaceful settlement should be fixed by international treaties, and the lifting of sanctions against Russia goes without saying. All this was perceived by both the Kiev junta and Western sponsors as an ultimatum. Therefore, it is more likely that the escalation of the conflict will continue, and the United States, together with its satellites, will try to continue its policy, which is collapsing more and more rapidly. However, the very refusal to comply with these requirements is already a clear signal that they have been heard. Therefore, the West will have no moral right to talk about attempts at peaceful settlement later. However, there is no morality left there for a long time. It remains to be hoped that in the West there is still some rationality and the instinct of self-preservation.
Comments